Canned Tuna

Albacore/white canned tuna eaten frequently.

48Moderate burden · out of 100
Cleaner swapLight skipjack tuna or small oily fish like sardines

How this score is built

  1. 100Start
  2. 77Chemical hazard 5 × 4.6−23
  3. 63.4Everyday exposure 4 × 3.4−13.6
  4. 48Persistence 6 × 2.6−15.6, then rounded to 48
  5. ModerateThe band48 sits in 40–59.

What each input rests on

The three ratings behind the score, and the studies each rests on
InputRatingEvidence
Chemical hazard5/10
  • In a Faroe Islands birth cohort of 1,022 children, prenatal methylmercury exposure from the mother's diet was linked at age 7 to poorer language, attention and memory, still seen after excluding children whose mothers had hair mercury above 10 µg/g.

    Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury · Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997

    DOI 10.1016/s0892-0362(97)00097-4 · PMID 9392777 · Abstract · read 2026-10-09

Everyday exposure4/10
  • In 168 cans bought in New Jersey from 1998 to 2003, white (albacore) tuna averaged 0.407 ppm mercury against 0.118 ppm for light tuna, and 25% of white tuna cans exceeded 0.5 ppm.

    Mercury in canned tuna: white versus light and temporal variation · Environ Res 2004

    DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2003.12.001 · PMID 15364590 · Abstract · read 2026-10-09

Persistence6/10

Ratings are editorial. A study listed here supports the rating; it did not compute it. How the index is built

What this means for you

The persistence rating is the standout concern here — these compounds linger in the body and environment for years. Larger tuna accumulate methylmercury, which builds up in the body. Choosing smaller 'light' tuna or sardines keeps the omega-3s with far less mercury.

Evidence strength: strong

See where your whole exposure load is highest — free Exposure Score →

This entry and the whole Index, on your phone.

Get it on Google Play

Lower-exposure choices