Conventional Makeup (PFAS)

Long-wear foundation, mascara and lipstick.

50Moderate burden · out of 100
Cleaner swapCosmetics labelled PFAS-free

How this score is built

  1. 100Start
  2. 81.6Chemical hazard 4 × 4.6−18.4
  3. 68Everyday exposure 4 × 3.4−13.6
  4. 50Persistence 7 × 2.6−18.2, then rounded to 50
  5. ModerateThe band50 sits in 40–59.

What each input rests on

The three ratings behind the score, and the studies each rests on
InputRatingEvidence
Chemical hazard4/10
Everyday exposure4/10
  • Of 231 US and Canadian cosmetics screened, foundations, mascaras and lip products most often had elevated fluorine; 29 analysed products held PFAS at 22-10,500 ng/g, mostly undisclosed on the label.

    Fluorinated Compounds in North American Cosmetics · Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2021

    DOI 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00240 · Abstract · read 2026-10-02

Persistence7/10unsourced input

Searched 2026-10-05: The PFAS measured here are mainly short-chain or fluorotelomer compounds; the human half-life studies found cover long-chain PFAS (PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS), so none is cited.

Ratings are editorial. A study listed here supports the rating; it did not compute it. How the index is built

What this means for you

Studies have detected PFAS 'forever chemicals' in many long-wear and waterproof cosmetics, applied daily right on the skin. PFAS-free lines avoid them.

Evidence strength: moderate

See where your whole exposure load is highest — free Exposure Score →

This entry and the whole Index, on your phone.

Get it on Google Play

Lower-exposure choices