Paper & Bamboo Drinking Straws

Plastic-free straws marketed as the eco option.

55Moderate burden · out of 100
Cleaner swapStainless-steel or glass straws, or simply no straw

How this score is built

  1. 100Start
  2. 86.2Chemical hazard 3 × 4.6−13.8
  3. 76Everyday exposure 3 × 3.4−10.2
  4. 55Persistence 8 × 2.6−20.8, then rounded to 55
  5. ModerateThe band55 sits in 40–59.

What each input rests on

The three ratings behind the score, and the studies each rests on
InputRatingEvidence
Chemical hazard3/10
Everyday exposure3/10
Persistence8/10unsourced input

Searched 2026-10-05: The straw study's abstract does not name which PFAS it found, and the human half-life studies found cover only long-chain PFAS, so none is cited.

Ratings are editorial. A study listed here supports the rating; it did not compute it. How the index is built

What this means for you

A Belgian survey published in Food Additives & Contaminants detected PFAS in the majority of paper and bamboo straws tested — often at higher rates than in plastic ones, because the coating that makes them water-resistant is itself fluorinated. Reusable metal or glass avoids the coating question entirely.

Evidence strength: moderate

See where your whole exposure load is highest — free Exposure Score →

This entry and the whole Index, on your phone.

Get it on Google Play

Lower-exposure choices