Locally Caught Freshwater Fish

Fish taken from local rivers and lakes rather than bought.

38High burden · out of 100
Cleaner swapCheck your state, Tribal or territory fish advisory before eating the catch

How this score is built

  1. 100Start
  2. 72.4Chemical hazard 6 × 4.6−27.6
  3. 58.8Everyday exposure 4 × 3.4−13.6
  4. 38Persistence 8 × 2.6−20.8
  5. HighThe band38 sits in 20–39.

What each input rests on

The three ratings behind the score, and the studies each rests on
InputRatingEvidence
Chemical hazard6/10
  • EFSA's contaminants panel judged effects on the immune system the most critical for PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS and PFOS, set a tolerable weekly intake of 4.4 ng/kg body weight for their sum, and concluded that parts of the European population exceed it.

    Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food · EFSA J 2020

    DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223 · PMID 32994824 · Abstract · read 2026-10-05

Everyday exposure4/10
Persistence8/10

Ratings are editorial. A study listed here supports the rating; it did not compute it. How the index is built

What this means for you

The persistence rating is the standout concern here — these compounds linger in the body and environment for years. In July 2024 the EPA added twelve PFAS to the contaminants it recommends states and Tribes monitor in locally caught freshwater fish, and says its national fish-tissue survey has found PFAS at levels that may affect health. Advisories are issued water by water, so which lake or river the fish came from matters more than the species.

Evidence strength: strong

Sources: US EPA news release, 11 July 2024, 'EPA Releases New Science-Based Recommendations to Help More States, Tribes, and Territories Reduce Exposure to PFAS in Fish'; US EPA, 'Meaningful and Achievable Steps You Can Take to Reduce Your Risk'

See where your whole exposure load is highest — free Exposure Score →

This entry and the whole Index, on your phone.

Get it on Google Play

Lower-exposure choices